PhilArchive
open access
Conceptual schemes, analytic truths, and organizing the Pacific Ocean
I draw attention to how one of Donald Davidson’s arguments against the claim that others have an alternative conceptual scheme does not look compatible with his rejection of analytic truths – how his rejection of the third dogma of empiricism depends on accepting the first. The appendix contests Davidson’s approach to organizing the Pacific Ocean.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Adrift on the Pacific: A Boys [sic] Story of the Sea and its Perils#44783
- Information Extraction for Integrating Multidisciplinary Articles to Co-construct Coastal Knowledge#635172
- Social equity is key to sustainable ocean governance#268707
- Fathoming Postnatural Oceans: Towards a low trophic theory in the practices of feminist posthumanities#762237
- The Role of Philosophers in Climate Change#710804
Record · ID 103956
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive