Lancaster EPrints
metadata only
On the Choice of Genetic Distance in Spatial-Genetic Studies.
We look at how to choose genetic distance so as to maximise the power of detecting spatial structure. We answer this question through analysin g two population genetic models that allow for a spatially structured population in a continuous habitat. These models, like most that incorporate spatial s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Factors determining fine-scale spatial genetic structure within coexisting populations of common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.), and sessile oak (Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.)#647371
- Spatial relationships between tree species and gap characteristics in broad-leaved deciduous woodland.#1039445
- Confirmation of ecological and evolutionary models#748927
- Spatial-Scale Evolutionary Bias Sheds Light on the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient#651874
- Spatial and temporal variability in migration of a soaring raptor across three continents#955586
Record · ID 1039634
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive