Afridi v College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, bcca, 2026bcca378, 2026 bcca 378 (canlii), 2026, bcca, 378, (canlii), ca51170, 2026, procedure, pleadings, rule 9, 5, supreme court civil rules, r 9, 5(1), whether refusing leave to further amend applied too high a standard to pleadings, “meticulous” and “unimpeachable” compliance treated as threshold, leave to apply again to amend pleadings for viable claims, appeal allowed in part, civil liability, torts, misfeasance in public office, odhavji estate v woodhouse, whether pleadings and submissions could support misfeasance claims against public bodies, deliberate and unlawful conduct, knowledge of unlawfulness and likely harm pleaded broadly, opportunity to plead misfeasance expressly to be considered on amendment, leave to apply again granted, civil liability, torts, negligence, rule 9, 5(1)(a), whether it was plain and obvious no negligence cause of action was disclosed, duty of care alleged from sponsorship and supervision role, standard of care and causation pleaded with loss of licence and wages, striking without determining reasonable cause of action held erroneous, appeal allowed in part, contracts, breach, honest performance and good faith, bhasin v hrynew, whether the pleadings identified a written contract, material terms, and alleged breaches, sponsorship withdrawal and failure to alert and investigate pleaded as bad faith performance, damages tied to loss of provisional licence and ability to work, leave to apply again granted, procedure, abuse of process, rule 9, 5(1)(b) and (d), saskatchewan (environment) v métis nation, saskatchewan, whether multiplicity of human rights proceedings supported striking as vexatious or abusive, insufficient weight to judicial economy, finality and integrity concerns, reliance on other proceedings found irrelevant or procedurally unfair, abuse of process finding set aside, appeal allowed in part