Springer Nature OA
open access
CC BY 4.0
Validation of the Measure of Peer Argumentive Discourse Style (PADS) in a Science Context: Evidence for the Construct Validity and Reliability
Scientific argumentation is an important practice for developing scientific literacy. This study provides an exploratory validation of the Peer Argumentive Discourse Style (PADS) measure—originally developed in Hebrew—within an English-speaking science education context. Confirmatory factor analysis
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Enhancing Science Classroom Discourse Analysis through Joint Multi-Task Learning for Reasoning-Component Classification#614993
- Enhancing Science Classroom Discourse Analysis through Joint Multi-Task Learning for Reasoning-Component Classification#614026
- Translational Literacy Framework (TLF): A Pedagogical Architecture for Cross-Disciplinary Evidence Evaluation and Communication in the AI Era#219506
- Categorial grammar and discourse representation theory#755746
- Identifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays#335846
Record · ID 1041476
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive