University of Nottingham Repository
metadata only
Reconceptualising blame, blameworthiness and basic desert: a new perspective on moral responsibility (and moral responsibility skepticism)
This thesis makes two broad sets of arguments, as reflected in its two distinct parts. In Part One, the first set of arguments concern how we might profitably reconceptualise moral responsibility. What motivates this is partly a sense of frustration at how concepts which are undoubtedly central to t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Guilty Confessions#772980
- Causal Involvement, Collectives, and Blame#728905
- Persons, punishment, and free will skepticism#775652
- Free Will Skepticism and the Question of Creativity: Creativity, Desert, and Self-Creation#708065
- Moral Responsibility Reconsidered#96718
Record · ID 1041721
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive