Yuridika
metadata only
The Problematics Implementation of Law and Regulations Testing in Indonesia
One of the results of the constitutional change, particularly during the 3rd amendment in 2001 is related to the arrangement of judicial powers exercised by two state institutions; the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK). Both as executors of judicial power are given different dutie
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Constitutional Transformation and Public Power: Reinterpreting the Separation of Powers in Contemporary Indonesia#401565
- Upholding Democracy through Constitutional Courts: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Germany#249185
- A CONSTITUTIONAL-ETHICAL STUDY OF THE INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 62/PUU-XXII/2024 ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY REVIEW OF THE PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD#451075
- Integration of Uṣul al-Fiqh in the Indonesian Legal System: A Study on the Role of the Indonesian Republic Supreme Court#990550
- PEMBATASAN UPAYA HUKUM PERKARA PERDATA GUNA MEWUJUDKAN ASAS PERADILAN SEDERHANA, CEPAT DAN BIAYA RINGAN#1042443
Record · ID 1042589
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive