ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Cost Profile and Budget Implications of Rechargeable Versus Non-rechargeable Sacral Neuromodulation Devices for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
Traditional sacral neuromodulation devices are not rechargeable. In recent years, new rechargeable sacral neuromodulation devices have been developed and put into the market. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost savings of a rechargeable sacral neuromodulation device versus a non-rechargeable sacral neuromodulation device for the treatment of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Time of Effect Onset in Treating Overactive Bladder or Non Obstructive Urinary Retention by Sacral Neuromodulation#830603
- Long-term Urodynamics in Individuals With Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction#1032196
- Efficacy of Sacral Nerve Modulation on Urinary and Defecation Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury：A Prospective, Single-arm Study#827755
- Sacral Neuromodulation in Children and Adolescents#1101043
- First-in-man Safety and Efficacy Trial of a Novel Non-invasive Bladder Emptying Device: The NIBED Study#849347
Record · ID 1044251
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive