ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Efficacy and Accuracy of Combined Localization Versus Single Localization in Non-palpable Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy
The standard method for localizing non-palpable breast cancer is currently clip localization, its positive margin rate still remains around 20-50%. This study aims to compare the accuracy and efficacy of single vs. combined breast tissue markers in localizing non-palpable breast cancer.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ultrasound localisation microscopy predicts neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with breast cancer.#615879
- Contextualized Malignantization: Morphometric Signatures of Breast Tissue Transformation and a Clinically Translatable Diagnostic Algorithm.#440737
- Ultrasound Targeting for the Lumpectomy Cavity#811343
- MarginProbe, a Device for Intraoperative Assessment of Margin Status in Breast Conservation Surgery#1112130
- S3-Tracker: Self-Supervised Surgical Tissue Tracking With Contrastive Random Walks#1083764
Record · ID 1045201
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive