ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Anal Fistula Plug Versus Endorectal Advancement Flap
The purpose of this study is to determine whether anal fistula plug or endorectal advancement flap is more successful in the treatment of anal fistulas and compared both procedures with regards to cost.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Capturing quality of life in pouch anal and vaginal fistula: development of PAVF-QoL-14, a patient-reported outcome measure.#659494
- Seton or Glue for Trans-sphincteric Anal Fistulas#903029
- Treatment of Perianal Fistulas by Endorectal Advancement Flap Associated With Adipose Tissue Injection#837689
- Supraclavicular Versus Axillary Block for Arteriovenous (AV) Fistula Creation#1112876
- Gore-BioA Fistula Plug to Treat Transsphincteric Fistulas#1086799
Record · ID 1045356
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive