ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Efficacy of Self-adhesive Silicone Gel Waterproof Dressings Versus Conventional Dressings in the Healing of Incisions After Total Joint Arthroplasty
The efficacy of using self-adhesive silicone gel waterproof dressings versus conventional gauze dressings for recovery after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains unclear. In our study, we conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare these two types of dressings. Patients were divided into two groups following TJA, and we collected primary outcome measures such as skin infection rate and re-operation rate. Additionally, we gathered blood inflammatory indicators, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), to evaluate the effectiveness of the two treatments. Finally, we perform one year follow up including REEDA score, MSS score to evaluate the recovery of the skin.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Wound Fluid Protease Levels During Use of Novel Wound Dressing#1127806
- Evaluation of Exufiber Ag+ and Other Gelling Fibre Dressings#846928
- Feasibility Study of a Novel Device for Chronic Wounds#851964
- Smart Wound Dressings and the Biological Parameters They Monitor: A Scoping Review.#30572
- Registry Trial of the Effectiveness of Platelet Rich Plasma for Chronic Non-Healing Wounds#913474
Record · ID 1045547
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive