ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Laparoscopic Hill and Laparoscopic Nissen Anti-Reflux Procedures
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects (good and bad) of the Laparoscopic Hill anti-reflux procedure with the Laparoscopic Nissen anti-reflux surgical procedure to see whether one is better than the other.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Longitudinal Study on the Evolution Trend and Influencing Factors of Postoperative Reflux of Esophageal Cancer Based on PEPTEST Technique#851030
- Fast Track Laparoscopic Surgery: A Better Option for Treating Colorectal Cancer Than Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery#1102918
- Comparison of Chemotherapy Before and After Surgery Versus After Surgery Alone for the Treatment of Gallbladder Cancer#853347
- Laparoscopic colon resection in patients with situs inversus totalis: is it the same operation as in patients without situs inversus totalis?#955487
- Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Assisted Open Surgery Through Subclavian Approach for Unilateral Thyroid Cancer#834729
Record · ID 1045899
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive