ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Study to Compare Efficacy, PK, PD, Safety and IMM of MB09 to Prolia® [EU-sourced] in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.
This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, multicenter, multinational study to compare the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MB09 versus Prolia® in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of Bmab 1000 vs reference denosumab: 78-wk results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-arm Phase 3 trial (DEVOTE) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.#170711
- A Study to Compare SB16 (Proposed Denosumab Biosimilar) to Prolia® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis#899917
- Risedronate in the Prevention of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women#859384
- Risedronate to Prevent Skeletal Related Events in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer Commencing Hormonal Therapy#807663
- Preventing Osteoporosis Using Denosumab#1139469
Record · ID 1046483
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive