ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis
A comparison study was performed between laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in acute setting in tertiary hospital to access the outcome of postoperative pain and hospital stay. As the popularity of laparoscopic appendectomy has failed in major tertiary hospital due to huge amount of patient load in which open appendectomy was performed.This study was performed to prove that outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy are far better than open appendectomy and to increase the use of laparoscopic surgery in acute settings
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Trial for a Outpatient Clinical Management of Urgent Laparoscopic Appendectomy#1072310
- Functional Outcomes of Open vs Laparoscopic Appendectomy#833717
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy#1086108
- A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy#801889
- ESP vs. EXORA Blocks for Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#1046156
Record · ID 1046810
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive