ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Study for Safety and Efficacy of Two Devices for the Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein
This is a multi center, randomized, comparison study using two already cleared methods of treatment of the great saphenous vein (GSV). The hypothesis to be tested is that the use of the Venacure EVLT NeverTouch procedure is no worse than the RF ClosureFAST procedure for treatment of the GSV. Evaluation of post operative pain and bruising, quality of life assessments, adverse event assessments, confirmation of long term GSV closure, use of medications are criteria that will be evaluated during the course of this study.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Short and Long-term Results of PCI in no Touch Vein-graft.#806693
- Saphenous Nerve Block for Foot and Ankle Surgery#853741
- Follow-up of SPTS in Patients With Raynaud's Phenomenon#908079
- Tourniquet vs. No Tourniquet for Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Release#842874
- A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Skinpen on Male and Female Subjects' Dorsal Hands as a Treatment of Hand Aging#900429
Record · ID 1046990
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive