Clinical Effectiveness of the Calcium Chloride (CaCl2) Surface- Treated Orthodontic Mini Implant (OMI)

The goal of this split mouth, randomised control study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of surface treated Calcium Chloride orthodontic mini implant in orthodontic patients. The main question\[s\] it aimed to answer were: Does the clinical effectiveness based on overall stability in maximum insertion torque and maximum removal torque measurement vary between untreated surface OMI, treated surface OMI with acid etching only and treated surface OMI with acid etching and calcium chloride immersion?, Does the surface roughness of OMI surface post removal vary between untreated surface OMI, treated surface OMI with acid etching only and treated-surface MI with acid etching and calcium chloride immersion? Does the success rate vary between untreated surface OMI, treated surface OMI with acid etching only and treated surface OMI with acid etching and calcium chloride immersion?Does the oral health quality of life and pain vary between untreated surface OMI, treated surface OMI with acid etching only and treated surface OMI with acid etching and calcium chloride immersion? Participants who is eligible for the study , orthodontic patient requiring moderate to high anchorage will be allocated to 2 groups (Group 1 : calcium chloride and control, Group 2 : acid etch, and control) to be used during the orthodontic treatment. The intervention is calcium chloride; the Calcium Chloride, positive control is the acid-etched and control is the machined group OMI. Comparison of the maximum insertion and removal torque, oral health quality of life, success rate and the surface roughness between the different groups of OMI.