ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Maintenance Treatment of Non Segmental Vitiligo With Tacrolimus Ointment 0.1% Versus Control
Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% has shown promising results for treating vitiligo in many prospective studies. Prospective randomized studies versus placebo are required to confirm the hypothesis that maintenance treatment with two applications of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% per week can reduce relapses of non-segmental vitiligo lesions. Main objective To assess the efficacy of maintenance therapy with topical tacrolimus vs placebo in the prevention of depigmentation in patients with vitiligo who responded to treatment. Secondary objectives * Evaluate the efficacy of maintenance therapy with tacrolimus vs topical placebo to decrease the intensity of depigmentation in patients with vitiligo who responded to treatment. * To study the occurrence of possible adverse effects. Length of the study Inclusion: 12 months Treatment: 6 months Follow-up: 6 months Total length of the study: 18 months Intervention Multicentric prospective interventional randomized comparative study versus placebo. * Visit V0: Selection Information of the patient, control of inclusion and non inclusion criteria. * Visit V1: Control of inclusion and non inclusion criteria, patients signed informed consent. An initial clinical evaluation and photographs in direct sunlight and UV. Topical treatment (tacrolimus or placebo) will be delivered to the patient by the hospital pharmacy and should be applied twice per week (3 or 4 days apart) for 24 weeks. * Visit V2: The patient will be reviewed after the end of treatment (24 weeks after the visit V1) for final evaluation. A clinical assessment will be made and photographs in the same way as the inclusion. Adverse reactions during treatment will be collected by the investigator (they will be noted as and when the patient in a notebook that will be presented at baseline). The percentage of depigmentation will be evaluated in a blinded treatment of photographs by two reviewers. In case of disagreement, the opinion of a third appraiser will be required. \- End o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery#902939
- Comparing the Efficacy of Topical Tazarotene Gel 0.1% v/s Microneedling in Atrophic Post Acne Scars#813662
- "A Clinical Study Investigating the Effectiveness of OTC Scar-management Modalities"#913223
- Tissue Reinforcement of Incisional Closure Among High Risk Patients#1137519
- Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of DEXTENZA in Pseudo Phakic Patients Undergoing Gas Bubble Repair and Laser Following Retinal Detachment#979656
Record · ID 1047761
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive