PhilArchive
open access
Replies to Critics of Immaterial: Rules in Contemporary Art
In this article I reply to commentary on Immaterial: Rules in Contemporary Art (Oxford, 2022) by Shelby Moser, Darren Hudson Hick, and Guy Rohrbaugh.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Précis of Immaterial: Rules in contemporary art#104682
- Benjamin's The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media#115626
- Arthur Danto and the End of Art#708356
- Danto and Dickie: Artworld and Institution#78260
- Immaterialist solutions to puzzles in personal ontology#776946
Record · ID 104841
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive