arXiv (All)
open access
Auditing Political Alignment in LLM Assistants: Engagement, Stance, and User Identity
LLM-based AI systems answer political questions for hundreds of millions of people. Current audits measure what they say to an average user, but their behavior is dynamic. I argue that their political behavior is a set of policies over whom to answer, what to say, and whether to engage at all, condi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Subjektsimulation und Diskursethik#698925
- The Engineered Correlation of Belief#689572
- When Single-User-Oriented LLM-based Assistants Involve Others: A Scoping Review of Pathways, Risks, and Responses#1083538
- Bias in the Loop: Auditing LLM-as-a-Judge for Software Engineering#120615
- DA-RAC: Distance-Aware Calibration of LLM Judges for Trustworthy AI Auditing#612389
Record · ID 1048434
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive