arXiv (All)
open access
Directing large language models to follow the letter or spirit of the law
The distinction between the spirit and letter of the law is a central issue across research and everyday life, and a growing concern for building safe, intelligent machines. What is this distinction based on, and how can we develop machines that follow the intention behind a rule? We used targeted a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Legal Language and the Legal Worldview: A Doctrinal Model of Critical Jurisprudence#335494
- POST‑WEB JURISPRUDENCE: The Structural Law of Morality, Trauma, Drift, and Systemic Exposure#1177918
- POST‑WEB JURISPRUDENCE: The Structural Law of Morality, Trauma, Drift, and Systemic Exposure#1177916
- Exploring LLMs Applications in Law: A Literature Review on Current Legal NLP Approaches#479550
- How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence#686331
Record · ID 1048832
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive