arXiv (All)
open access
Do Not Trust the Benchmark: Limitations of General LLM Rankings and a Case for Task-Specific Evaluation
Benchmark scores increasingly influence the development, marketing, and selection of large language models (LLMs). Yet an overall score is interpretable only in relation to the system tested, the questions included, and the conditions of evaluation. This perspective examines five connected limitatio
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Fluency: A Human-Centered Evaluation Rubric for Grounding, Answerability, and Reliability in LLM Outputs#118367
- The Double Measurement Confound in Agent Benchmarks: De-Scaffolding, Ground-Truth Scoring, and Reliability Beyond the Mean#986988
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#792877
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#788873
- Evaluating large language model performance in Risk of Bias assessments: A cross-sectional validation study.#358209
Record · ID 1048945
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive