arXiv (All)
open access
Auditing Bayesian Graph Alignment: Diagnostic Comparisons and Reference Failure
Bayesian graph alignment estimates correspondence probabilities, but convergence of an alignment-score trace need not imply accurate correspondence marginals. We audit this gap on 240 new exact graph pairs from four source families, 240 larger pairs with 20-100 vertices, and a separate 60-case exact
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Exact Bayesian Tracking of Dynamic Network Topologies#998804
- When Can You Correct Distribution Drift in Temporal Graph Generation? A Sharpening--Drift Tension and an Impossibility for Observation-Based Correction#405646
- GLASS: Graph-Language Alignment with Spherical Scoring for Transferable Graph-Level Anomaly Detection#660806
- Non-Gaussian Parameter Bias: Formalism and Validation#1157452
- BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees#6469
Record · ID 1048976
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive