arXiv (All)
open access
Graph Memory for LLM Agents: At What Cost? A Comparative Evaluation of Query, Ingest, and Update Performance Across Graph Database Engines
Graph databases are frequently positioned as categorically necessary for connected-data workloads, yet the systems dimension along which they actually differ - query planning, indexing, and data-readiness cost - is rarely isolated from vendor framing. We construct a synthetic, biomedical-shaped prop
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Graph Memory for LLM Agents: At What Cost? A Comparative Evaluation of Query, Ingest, and Update Performance Across Graph Database Engines#1028795
- Learning What to Retain: Gated-Memory Routing for Efficient Collaboration in Multi-Agent LLM Systems#997536
- GRBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluation for Graph-relational Data Management#819060
- GRBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Evaluation for Graph-relational Data Management#809068
- Views: A Hardware-Aware Recursively Labeled Graph Database Model for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning#1014538
Record · ID 1049058
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive