arXiv (All)
open access
GRACE: Grounded Adversarial Reasoning over Canadian Law
Large language models have shown strong performance across a range of legal tasks, but existing benchmarks rarely evaluate the ability to take and defend a legal position, reason under incomplete information, or synthesize multiple statutory provisions. This gap is particularly pronounced for Canadi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can LLMs Time Travel? Enhancing Temporal Consistency in Legal Agentic Search through Reinforcement Learning#1036711
- Canadian Review of Artificial Intelligence, Law & Society#1176141
- Canadian Review of Artificial Intelligence, Law & Society#1176140
- Canadian Review of Artificial Intelligence, Law & Society#1176139
- Emerging challenges in legal informatics from machine learning to LLMs - Preface to the proceedings of the 1st PLC workshop#1178260
Record · ID 1049462
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive