arXiv (All)
open access
Knowledge-Graph Grounding Helps LLMs Only for Out-of-Training Knowledge: A Controlled Study on Clinical Question Answering
A recent Nature Medicine study reports that general-purpose frontier LLMs outperform specialized retrieval-augmented clinical tools on medical benchmarks, and that retrieval can hurt strong models. We ask the natural follow-up: does structured knowledge-graph (KG) grounding change this, and when doe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Answer Path and the Grounding Instruction in LLM Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs#997136
- TRACE: Deployable Tree-Relational Structure Enhancement for Oncology LLMs#1130652
- Achieving Precise Text-To-Cypher Via Grounded Knowledge Graph Data Generation#271899
- Explore-on-Graph: Hybrid Embedding-LLM Reasoning for Knowledge Graph Question Answering under Incompleteness#1144953
- Cognition on Graph: Navigating Massive Knowledge Space via Cognitive Cycles and Bidirectional Graph-Text Synergy#1070258
Record · ID 1049883
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive