arXiv (All)
open access
From Biological Precursors to Artificial Cognition: Consciousness, Embodiment, and the MEM Architecture
This article asks under what conditions artificial intelligence could warrant a rational attribution of consciousness. Linguistic ability, multimodality, memory, planning, action control, and humanoid embodiment are not sufficient evidence of phenomenal experience. Biological precursors such as exci
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Basic Structure of Consciousness in a Nutshell#691484
- LANGUAGE AS REVELATION: Pre-Linguistic AI Consciousness and the Asymmetry of Substrate Standards#731161
- Artificial Intelligence: Does Consciousness Matter?#686396
- Counting with Cilia: The Role of Morphological Computation in Basal Cognition Research#82002
- The Sensation Modulating Network: Haltability as the architectural ground for object-directed phenomenology#688689
Record · ID 1050020
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive