arXiv (All)
open access
MCPGen: Benchmarking LLMs on Executable MCPWorkflow Development
We study whether LLMs can produce executable workflow artifacts that remain consistent across graph structure, tool implementation, schema bindings, and runtime wiring. In this setting, correctness depends on cross-layer consistency: a workflow may be structurally plausible, yet still fail because t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- MCPGen: Benchmarking LLMs on Executable MCPWorkflow Development#1028770
- Requirements-Augmented Generation for Trustworthy Acceptance Testing of LLM-Based Software#451358
- VibeCheck: Assessing the Quality of LLM-Generated Unit Tests: A Multi-agent Empirical Study across Heterogeneous Repositories#1084378
- Evaluating LLM-Based 0-to-1 Software Generation in End-to-End CLI Tool Scenarios#2702
- Graphical-Probabilistic Modeling of Generative Flows in LLM-Native Software Systems#282879
Record · ID 1050115
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive