arXiv (All)
open access
Think Before You Accept: Can Written Justification Reduce Uncritical Uptake of AI Writing Suggestions?
Generative AI can offer students useful feedback, but its value depends on judging which suggestions are accurate and relevant. Prior research shows that strategic friction during human-AI interactions can promote critical uptake, but how to effectively implement such friction in academic contexts r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Designing Proactive Thought Partners for Writing#821612
- Core principles of responsible generative AI usage in research#730719
- RPS: Information Elicitation with Reinforcement Prompt Selection#14045
- Voices of Freelance Professional Writers on AI: Limitations, Expectations, and Fears#1142534
- Corporate Loyalty: Some AI Systems Differentially Downplay their Creators' Controversies#819825
Record · ID 1050125
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive