arXiv (All)
open access
When AI Tutors Speak: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment
Students increasingly study alongside generative artificial intelligence (AI), yet unguided access to fluent answers invites cognitive offloading, and there is little evidence on which configurations of AI tutoring produce learning. Two design margins are usually bundled together: pedagogical struct
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Generative AI as an External Cognitive Tool for Developing Creative Intelligence in Visual Design: A Mixed-Methods Randomized Study Using Cognitive Load Indicators and Motivational Modeling.#140519
- Learning with, rather than through, AI: co-designing science education for critical AI literacy#723025
- Am I the author? An intervention-based study of authorial discernment in AI-mediated student writing#426299
- Latino Youth as Sociotechnical Designers: Learning AI through Co-Design, Community, and Imagination#1038700
- Mitigating Prompt-Induced Cognitive Biases in General-Purpose AI for Software Engineering#120617
Record · ID 1050147
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive