arXiv (All)
open access
When More Evidence Hurts: Publication-Bias Drift and Principled Stopping for Biomedical Causal Search
Automated biomedical evidence synthesis depends on retrieving published studies, but the biomedical literature is systematically skewed toward positive findings. Deeper retrieval can therefore make a system \emph{more} likely to falsely infer benefit when the true effect is null. We formalise this p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can Jev Judge Radiology Reports? Evaluating a System One Model for Clinical Factuality#1064151
- Federated causal discovery in medicine: trends, opportunities, and challenges.#421055
- High-Level Explanation and the Interventionist’s ‘Variables Problem’#734716
- Is Design Inference Epistemically Special?#691479
- PARNESS: A Paper Harness for End-to-End Automated Scientific Research with Dynamic Workflows, Full-Text Indexing, and Cross-Run Knowledge Accumulation#168411
Record · ID 1050287
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive