arXiv (All)
open access
The Undetected Damage of Quantization on Retrieval and How to Fix It
We show that a quantized model that keeps its classification accuracy still changes $14$ to $46\%$ of its top-1 retrieval results, and that aggregate ranking metrics reveal only part of this damage. We tie this failure to the gap between the two highest scores and use that gap to decide when a quant
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Consistency Argument for Ranking Functions#741025
- Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Prompting#16646
- Ranking Theory#741020
- UniPinRec: Unifying Generative Retrieval and Ranking at Pinterest Scale#1117445
- Ranking Experiments under Sequential Sampling#684603
Record · ID 1050502
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive