arXiv (All)
open access
Human-LLM Deliberation as Interactive Proof: Conditions for Verifiability Without Transparency
When an LLM supplies an argument that a user could not readily construct, how can the user decide whether to accept its claim? Inspired by interactive proofs, we model human-LLM deliberation as an interaction between a prover with unrestricted internal search and a resource-bounded human verifier. T
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Deterministic Decision Verification and Proof-Gated Execution#127237
- ContextClaim: A Context-Driven Paradigm for Verifiable Claim Detection#629959
- ContextClaim: A Context-Driven Paradigm for Verifiable Claim Detection#628097
- Cognitive Proof of Work and the Real Price of Machine Intelligence#715355
- Programmers Are Poor and Overconfident Judges of LLM-Generated Assertions#361535
Record · ID 1051292
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive