arXiv (All)
open access
What Does 99% Accuracy Measure? A Reproducible Audit of Shortcut Learning in a Widely Used Fake News Corpus
Text classifiers trained on the ISOT/Kaggle "Fake and Real News" corpus routinely report accuracy and F1 above 0.98, a level of performance that sits uneasily beside the difficulty of assessing veracity. Using a transparent TF-IDF and linear-classifier pipeline as a measurement instrument, we audit
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The science of fake news#10477
- A Knowledge-Evidence-Propagation Framework for Fake News Detection#381282
- Effects of Automated and Participative Decision Support in Computer-Aided Credibility Assessment#363430
- A Survey on Fake Review Detection: From Pre-trained Language Models to Large Language Models#1104491
- Fake news & bad science journalism: the case against insincerity#729579
Record · ID 1051499
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive