arXiv (All)
open access
Compressibility is not Feedback: A Random-access Gap in Causal Semantic Repair
Semantic feedback can repair a noisy first decode without retransmitting the whole message, but current end-to-end evaluations hide where a feedback design fails. An oracle that sees both the source-side state and receiver observation may describe a useful correction with few bits, while the receive
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reviewer Capability Governs Rejection Targeting, Not Repair Skill: Evidence from LLM Execute-Review-Revise Pipelines#660890
- Infelicitous Cancellation: The Explicit Cancellability Test for Conversational Implicature Revisited#744506
- Bringing the State Back In (Yet Again): Reviews, Revisions, Rejections, and Redirections.#169224
- Bringing the State Back In (Yet Again): Reviews, Revisions, Rejections, and Redirections.#167928
- A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review#1143994
Record · ID 1051513
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive