arXiv (All)
open access
Can Large Language Model-Generated Responses Support Assessment Development? A Human-Calibrated Rasch Benchmark
Large language models (LLMs) are proposed as synthetic respondents for pilot testing, but their usefulness depends on whether they supply the evidence assessment development requires. We calibrated rating scale models on 14 digital-use skill items from 6,245 adults and used the human item parameters
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Fluency: A Human-Centered Evaluation Rubric for Grounding, Answerability, and Reliability in LLM Outputs#118367
- MA-SAPO: Multi-Agent Reasoning for Score-Aware Prompt Optimization#1118430
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#792877
- Do large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effects#788873
- (Towards) Scalable Reliable Automated Evaluation with Large Language Models#414122
Record · ID 1051552
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive