arXiv (All)
open access
Calibration Count Reuse: Validity Does Not Determine Efficiency
Calibration count reuse raises separate validity and efficiency questions. We give a validity criterion for general count-dependent nonconformity scores: transferring one count from another class to the scored class must not improve its conformity. A leave-self-out full conformal reference proves th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Early-Stabilizing Counting#200454
- Validation of Romanian Version of Radner Reading Charts#1150416
- The effects of the forgetting curve in the training of knee arthroplasty surgical instrument nurses: a pilot randomized controlled trial.#25555
- Impact of aging on the dynamics of memory retrieval: a time-course analysis#954485
- Reference-based sensitivity analysis for repeated count outcomes using negative binomial margins and a Gaussian copula#1115870
Record · ID 1051631
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive