arXiv (All)
open access
Are Human-Aligned Models Models of Humans? A Turing-Test Gap in Preference Alignment
Human-feedback alignment has made language models useful assistants and is commonly described as aligning them with humans. However, the responses people prefer from an AI need not be the responses they themselves would give. We distinguish alignment with human preferences from alignment with human
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Relative Density Ratio Optimization for Stable and Statistically Consistent Model Alignment#1116246
- Recognition-Refusal Misalignment in LLMs: Why Models Answer Structurally Unanswerable Questions#793331
- Recognition-Refusal Misalignment in LLMs: Why Models Answer Structurally Unanswerable Questions#789327
- AlignDiff: Exploiting Model-Intrinsic Information for Better Preference Data Selection#973519
- ReFrame: Evidence-Guided Test-Time Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models#662273
Record · ID 1052296
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive