IDEALS @ University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
metadata only
Negotiating Qualitative Research Quality in the Age of AI
The advent of widely accessible AI-based products has raised new questions about the use of technology for analyzing qualitative data and what it means to do rigorous qualitative work. Answering these questions requires that researchers have a strong sense of what quality of research means in their
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?#652657
- Navigating the spaces between method and technology with qualitative researchers#274811
- The Chain Behind the Claim: Warrantability in AI-Assisted Qualitative Research#660489
- All Quiet on the AI Front: The Future of Undergraduate Math Research, Viewed from Duluth#1076271
- Against Mechanical Subjectivity: The Misalignment of Generative AI as a Tool for Qualitative Research#444255
Record · ID 1053633
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive