PhilArchive
open access
Philosophical aspects of pandemics
From the existentialism of Albert Camus and Sartre, to the replacement of the exclusion ritual with the disciplinary mechanism of Michel Foucault, an ideal form of control of state authorities of all forms of "disorder", and viral modernity and bioinformationalism. And about the Gaia hypothesis, developed by James Lovelock and supported in the current pandemic by Bruno Latour. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34967.80801
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Interpreting and Responses to Pandemics in Indian Philosophical Traditions and Films#92911
- Ecology and the Unbuffered Self: Identity, Agency, and Authority in a Time of Pandemic#738708
- Medical science and the madness of crowds; context for our COVID pandemic years.#425069
- Non/Living Queerings, Undoing Certainties, and Braiding Vulnerabilities: A Collective Reflection#762248
- Produção de vida e manutenção da existência em um cotidiano pandêmico: perspectivas, experiências e reflexões de docentes de Terapia Ocupacional#823948
Record · ID 105452
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive