PsyArXiv
metadata only
Ensuring quality in research, 'Authorship Effect' & Conflict of Interest. Response submitted to BMJ Mental Health in response to 'Clinician perspectives on the utility and acceptability of OxSATS: a qualitative study of a novel structured suicide risk assessment tool
This paper is a response to the recent BMJ Mental Health publication, 'Clinician perspectives on the utility and acceptability of OxSATS: a qualitative study of a novel structured suicide risk assessment tool.’1 We outline several methodological limitations, including a dissonance between the partic
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Study of Citations: Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Top-cited Publications on Panic Disorder#419085
- A Study of Citations: Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Top-cited Publications on Panic Disorder.#418504
- The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations#6228
- Trial of Written Exposure for Metastatic Cancer Patients (EASE)#804088
- Narrative Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder#878898
Record · ID 1054790
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive