PsyArXiv
metadata only
Integrating conflicting visual 3D shape cues
How does the visual system handle discrepant estimates of depth from conflicting visual cues? One possibility is that less reliable cues are suppressed in favor of cues that are more likely to produce veridical depth estimates. This can be accomplished by a statistically robust implementation of the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Integrating conflicting visual 3D shape cues#1040272
- Depth perception from pairs of overlapping cues in pictorial displays#721158
- CrossDepth: Geometry-Constrained Attention for Generalizable Multi-View Surround Depth Estimation#972323
- Two Out of Three Ain’t Bad: Aggregating Multiple Identification Decisions from the Same Observer Improves Unfamiliar Face Matching Performance#637647
- MomentBA: Second-order Spatial Moments for Anisotropic Correspondence Uncertainty in Differentiable Bundle Adjustment#1071455
Record · ID 1054836
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive