PsyArXiv
metadata only
Research practices and transparency in Slovak social sciences: A national analysis based on random sampling of publications (2013-2022)
The credibility of the social sciences has been increasingly questioned, with concerns centering on limited transparency, replicability, questionable research practices, and incomplete reporting. Most evidence on these problems comes from self-report surveys, which are subject to recall and self-pre
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Research practices and transparency in Slovak social sciences: A national analysis based on random sampling of publications (2013-2022)#1040280
- Different Understandings of Scientific Research in the Use of De-identified Personal Sensitive Data: South Korea, in Comparative Perspectives.#423079
- Germany: a fair balance between scientific freedom and data subjects’ rights?#462087
- Book review: “Psychology’s Misuse of Statistics and Persistent Dismissal of its Critics” by James T. Lamiell#107665
- Paradox of Method: Suresh Chandra on Social Scientific Research#772735
Record · ID 1054862
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive