ScholarlyCommons at Penn
metadata only
A Tool, Not an Author: Limiting Generative AI in Adjudicatory Decisionmaking
In recent years, courts and administrative agencies have begun using large language models (LLMs) to research law, summarize records, and draft decisions. Adoption of LLMs in the legal field is outpacing any settled account of what these tools may legitimately do. This project analyzes Frank Pasqual
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Tool, Not an Author: Limiting Generative AI in Adjudicatory Decisionmaking#1055217
- INTEGRATING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTO LEGAL ENGLISH ESP EDUCATION IN UZBEKISTAN: ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE OF FUTURE LAWYERS#299465
- AI Jurisprudence: Toward Automated Justice#1178091
- Time To Regulate Use of Generative AI In Professional Legal Practice - A Study of Recent Errors While Using Generative AI and Its Ethical Implications#293763
- GenAI and the Self Represented Litigant#1044004
Record · ID 1055199
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive