PhilArchive
open access
Longitudinal Human–AI Interaction: From Interaction Signatures to Behavioral Regimes The Signature-Induced Behavioral Regime (SIBR) Hypothesis
Research on steering the behavior of large language models (LLMs) has largely focused on prompt engineering, where the wording and structure of prompts are treated as the primary mechanisms guiding model responses. Within this framework, changes to prompt design are assumed to produce corresponding changes in model behavior. In this paper we propose an alternative hypothesis: that model responses may also be influenced by interaction signatures, recurring patterns in a user’s reasoning style, framing of questions, abstraction level, and conversational structure. These patterns may be detectable through statistical pattern recognition within the model’s processing of the current dialogue. We refer to the proposed mechanism as Signature-Induced Behavioral Regimes (SIBR). Under SIBR, recognizable interaction signatures activate corresponding behavioral regimes within the model. Once activated, these regimes may influence the structure of reasoning, depth of explanation, and conversational stance exhibited by the model during the interaction. Importantly, the SIBR hypothesis does not rely on persistent user memory or recognition of individual identity. Instead, the proposed mechanism arises from statistical inference over the language present within the current interaction context. Because interaction signatures may contain distinctive patterns, similar regimes may emerge across independently initialized sessions when similar interaction patterns appear. This paper introduces the SIBR hypothesis as a conceptual framework for understanding how broader patterns of human–AI interaction may influence model behavior beyond prompt structure alone. We situate this hypothesis within existing research on prompt engineering, in-context learning, and representation steering, and propose experimental protocols for evaluating whether interaction signatures reliably activate consistent behavioral regimes across model runs.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Contextual Contamination- The Silent Drift of Large Language Models via Stored Conversation Data#94408
- What Kind of Reasoning (if any) is an LLM actually doing? On the Stochastic Nature and Abductive Appearance of Large Language Models#701151
- Questionnaire Responses Do not Capture the Safety of AI Agents#95244
- CCA-MLA-01: A Cross-System Case Study in Interpretive Ground-Setting#97470
- Introspective Machines: Are LLMs Better at Self‐Reflection Than Humans?#82383
Record · ID 105564
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive