ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
RCT of Two Noncrosslinked Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrices in Ab Wall Reconstruction
The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical outcomes of two commonly used, FDA-approved biologic meshes in hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction (Strattice and XenMatrix). The two meshes are derived from pig skin from which cells have been removed and which have been sterilized. The two meshes are made by two different companies using different processes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Use of a Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia#1033651
- Open Mesh Versus Suture Repair in Treatment of Abdominal Wall Hernias#1075748
- The Use of Different Types of Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia Versus Primary Abdominal Suturing#1029979
- Visible vs. Non-Visible Mesh in Underlay Positon After Repair of Umbilical Hernias#913842
- A Prospective, Multicenter All Comers Study of Phasix Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair#840650
Record · ID 1056988
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive