ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two Hydroxy-apatite Coated Hip Stems
In this study, the investigators propose to randomize 80 subjects to receive either the Avenir cementless hip stem or a competing, HA-coated hip stem (Corail, DePuy-Synthes) and follow these patients for a period of 2 years post-surgery. The investigators aim to determine if the Avenir cementless hip stem has equivalent or better fixation and clinical outcomes compared to a predicate hip stem with longer clinical history.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Randomised Single Centre Study to Compare the Long-term Performance of 4 Designs of the DePuy Ultima LX Stem in Primary Total Hip Replacement#857391
- Cemented Marathon/Corail Versus Pinnacle/Corail#1113513
- Effect of Cemented Stem Design on Periprosthetic Bone Mass Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty#870792
- A Comparative Study of Stem and Cup Fixation and Polyethylene Wear#831941
- Observational Study to Evaluate Long-Term Outcome in Hip Hemiarthroplasty#840394
Record · ID 1057620
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive