ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Randomised Comparison of 2 Cold Snare Polypectomy Techniques
Different modalities are employed to remove small colonic polyps which potentially harbour a cancer risk. But, they can all vary in their completeness of removal, safety and the histological quality and the gold standard technique has yet to be defined. A novel suction pseudopolyp technique has been described by Patullo et al and in their prospective study, 126 polyps measuring less than 10mm flat or sessile were removed by this method with 100% complete endoscopic resection and without any immediate or delayed complications. The aim of the investigators study is to compare this technique with the standard cold snare technique. Patients attending for a routine colonoscopy and found to have polyps measuring 37mm in size will be eligible and they will be randomised to the polypectomy technique. Patient demographics and polyp characteristics will be recorded. The primary outcome measured will be the macroscopic resection rate. The secondary outcome measures are abdominal pain, tenderness, bleeding and fever.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effectiveness of Cold Biopsy Forceps With Pre-lift for Complete Resection of Colonic Polyps ≤7mm in Size#1112692
- Complete Histologic Resection of Adenomatous Polyps?#869333
- Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection#899263
- Cold Snare Versus Double Biopsy Polypectomy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps#890920
- Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps#834257
Record · ID 1057900
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive