ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Between Two Medical Devices for Labor Induction After Previous C-section
The objective of the study ist to compare the Dilapan-S and the Cook Ballon device for the mechanical induction of labour in women with a previous C-section. There is currently lack of data regarding this comparison of the two methods for mechanical labour induction in this patient collective. Any method used for labour induction is therefore off-label. The primary outcome is the time between placement of the device and delivery. Ad secondary outcomes are among others the cesarean delivery rate and patient satisfaction with the induction method.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cervical Ripening Balloon in Induction of Labour at Term#1075403
- Prostaglandins Versus Trans-cervical Balloon for Induction of Labor in Fetal Growth Restriction (PROBIN)#882941
- Mechanical Dilation of the Cervix in a Scarred Uterus#842706
- Buscopan in Patients Undergoing IVF/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Treatment#849542
- Transvaginal Sonographic Measurement of Cervical Length Versus Bishop Score in Induction of Labour for Prediction of Caesarean Delivery.#1140312
Record · ID 1058321
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive