ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Conventional TEVAR Versus FABULOUS RCT
For High-risk Type B aortic dissections, a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study is conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of conventional proximal endovascular repair (TEVAR) alone versus the Fabulous system which includes a proximal stent graft with a distal bare metal stent implanted. The study aims to determine the optimal intervention method for such population.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Endovascular Aortic Repair With the E-Tegra Device: Preliminary Outcomes From a Multicenter National Registry#264873
- Comparative Study Of Safety And Efficacy Of The SUPERA® Nitinol Stent - Iliac Artery#904308
- Feasibility and Safety Study of the Endologix Fenestrated Stent Graft System#830648
- Endovascular Treatment of TAAA and Aortic Arch Aneurysms Using Fenestrated and Branched Stent Grafts#887136
- Evaluation of the Castor Single Branch Stent Graft in Treatment of Acute Aortic Syndrome#979725
Record · ID 1059758
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive