ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Uncemented Tritanium TKR vs Cemented Triathlon TKR
The Study aims to investigate whether there is a clinically important difference in peri-articular bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) between patients undergoing two different types of knee replacement fixation - uncemented Tritanium total knee replacement (TKR) and cemented Triathlon TKR. Before undertaking a full randomised control trial however, it is necessary to establish that the proposed methodology and approach are feasible. Therefore an internal pilot study will be performed first. This registration is for the internal pilot study.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Outcome Study for the Triathlon Cruciate Retaining (CR) Total Knee#855059
- Fluoroscopic and RSA Evaluation of the Triathlon Total Knee Prosthetic Design#886498
- chronOS Inject in Proximal Tibial Fractures#1058163
- Evaluating BMD in Participants ≥50 Years Old Switching From EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF or EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF to ABC/DTG/3TC#1059616
- A Phase 3 Study of DU-176b, Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty#966961
Record · ID 1059903
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive