ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Computed Tomography Versus Standard 2D Mammography Versus 3D Tomosynthesis
The purpose of this study is to compare the imaging performance of an investigational breast computed tomography (CT) scanner, built at UC Davis, with that of an FDA-Approved breast tomosynthesis scanner (capable of producing standard 2-D mammography and 3-D tomosynthesis images), built by Hologic, Incorporated, in a group of patients with suspected breast cancer.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Screening for Breast Cancer With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis#1057692
- Improved in-plane visibility of tumors using breast tomosynthesis#823224
- Digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: an ethical perspective#77917
- Chemotherapy Monitoring With Breast Computed Tomography (CT)#916181
- Holoscopy — Holographic optical coherence tomography#978598
Record · ID 1059964
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive